Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5525 (PNJ)

AMANDEEP VERMA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/43737/2025 · 2026-02-06

Mandeep Pannu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No. Date of Decision: 06.02.2026 ...Petitioners Versus ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present:- Mr. Mohit Kakkar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. H.S. Wadhwa, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Vishal Punia, Advocate and Mr. Ramneek Singh, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. ***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral) A report has been received from the concerned Court stating that the parties did not appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded. Learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 submits that the respondents are not willing to get their statements recorded. In view of the statement so made, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he does not wish to pursue the present petition and prays that the same be dismissed as withdrawn. Ordered accordingly. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) 06.02.2026 JUDGE Anu Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ANU 2026.02.06 14:47 I am the author of this document Chandigarh