Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5525 (PAT)

Sagar Kumar @ Liliya v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./16961/2026 · 2026-03-16

Ashok Kumar Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16961 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-678 Year-2025 Thana- GORAUL District- Vaishali ====================================================== Sagar Kumar @ Liliya, S/o Anupam Kumar @ Anupam Kumar Agrawal, R/o vill - Goraul, P.S.- Goraul, Distt.- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Lal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 16-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No. 678 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 317(5), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 3(5) of B.N.S. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that police had information that one Pawan Kumar has kept stolen bikes at his house. On this input, the house of Pawan Kumar was searched. He was not found there but from his house, two bikes were recovered. It is further alleged that from the house of this petitioner also, two bikes were recovered. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16961 of 2026(2) dt.16-03-2026 2/2 committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. The recovery has been made from the joint house. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. The witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel. Police has not complied Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. It has also been submitted that this case is triable by Learned Judicial Magistrate First Class. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 21.11.2025. 5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail and has submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of one case. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali, Hajipur in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No. 678 of 2025. lata/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T