Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 55244 (MAD)

V.Kanagamani v. The State of Tamilnadu rep by

WP Crl.(MD)/4035/2026 · 2026-07-21

L Victoria Gowri

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.Crl.(MD)No.4035 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.07.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.P.Crl.(MD)No.4035 of 2026 V.Kanagamani ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep By the Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil. 2. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Nagercoil Town Sub Division, Kanyakumari District. 3. The Inspector of Police, Vadasery Police Station, Kanyakumari District. 4. Ayyappan 5. Anu ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider and take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on the petitioner complaint dated 10.07.2026 bearing Reference No.OLC589600037176 against the 4th and 5th respondents, within a time frame that may be fixed by this Court. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.4035 of 2026 For Petitioner : Mr.R.Maheswaran For Respondents : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy (R1 to R3) Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER This petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to consider and take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on the petitioner's complaint dated 10.07.2026 in Reference No.OLC589600037176 against the 4th and 5th respondents, within a time frame that may be fixed by this Court. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had lodged a complaint alleging that the petitioner was defrauded to the tune of Rs.2,90,000/- by the private respondents. Since no effective action was taken on the complaint, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present writ petition. 3. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent police submitted that the enquiry is pending. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.4035 of 2026 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and carefully perused the materials before this Court. Since no adverse order is proposed to be passed against the private respondents, notice to them is dispensed with. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the third respondent police is directed to consider the petitioner's complaint dated 10.07.2026 and conduct an enquiry in this regard, after issuing summons to the parties concerned, under Section 64 of the BNSS, and conclude the same, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. This writ petition is disposed with the above directions. 21.07.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No sm 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.4035 of 2026 L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. Sm TO:- 1. The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil. 2. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Nagercoil Town Sub Division, Kanyakumari District. 3. The Inspector of Police, Vadasery Police Station, Kanyakumari District. 4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Order made in W.P.Crl.(MD)No.4035 of 2026 Dated 21.07.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis