Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 8210 of 2026 Court No. - 81 HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present application has been filed by applicants for quashing the non-bailable warrant dated 7.2.2017 issued by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Railway Prayagraj as well as proceeding of Case No. 4609 of 2013 (State vs. Sonu Raidas) arising out of Case Crime No. 125 of 2013, under Section 153 of Railway Act, Police Station RPF Naini, District Prayagraj. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is ready to appear before the court concerned and on account of compelling circumstances, he could not appear on the date fixed before the court below therefore, as a result of the same, non bailable warrant dated 7.2.2017 has been issued against the applicant. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant undertakes to participate in the trial court's proceedings and he shall remain present before the court concerned unless the personal presence of the applicant is exempted by the court below. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant will cooperate in the trial court's proceedings. 5. On the other hand learned AGA submits that due to non appearance of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Lakhan Deobanshi, Ranjit Kumar Sagar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sonu Raidas .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
the applicant on several dates, the leaned trial Court proceeded to issue non bailable warrant against the applicant. 6. In view of the facts of the case, this Court deems it fit that non bailable warrant issued against the applicant shall be kept in abeyance for a period of four weeks and applicant shall appear before the court concerned within the time fixed by this Court. If, the applicant appears before the court concerned, non bailable warrant shall not be further executed. However, if the applicant fails to appear or participate in the trial proceeding within the time fixed by this Court, non bailable warrant shall be executed against the applicant without delay. 7. In view of the aforesaid, this application is disposed of.
March 18, 2026 Lalit Shukla NA528 No. 8210 of 2026 2 (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- LALIT KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad