[2026:RJ-JP:12725] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1749/2026 1. Shaitan Singh Son of Shri Sajjan Singh, Resident of Dholpuriya, Kalanada, Tehsil Arain, District Ajmer (Raj). At present resident of Kishangarh, District Ajmer (Raj). 2. Yuvraj Singh Son of Shri Shaitan Singh, Resident of Dholpuriya, Kalanada, Tehsil Arain, District Ajmer (Raj). At present resident of Kishangarh, District Ajmer (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan through P.P. 2. Shakti Singh Son of Shri Ummed Singh, aged 24 Years, Resident of Bhairav Nagar, Majhela Road, Infront of Nobal School, Police Station Kishangarh, District Ajmer (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shyam Bihari Gautam For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP Mr. Vijay Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 24/03/2026 1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the entire criminal proceedings arising out of FIR No.44/2026 registered at Police Station Kishangarh, District Ajmer (Rajasthan) for offences punishable under Sections 324(4), 324(6), 351(2), 351(3) & 189(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023 (corresponding to Sections 427, 440, 506 & 142 of IPC) on the basis of compromise. [2026:RJ-JP:12725] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-1749/2026] 2. Petitioners and complainant-respondent No.2 are present in person. They have duly been identified by their respective counsel. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this petition, parties have entered into compromise. Counsel submits that due to compromise, further proceedings in the impugned FIR are fruitless and continuation thereof would be a futile exercise and a waste of precious judicial time and resources. Therefore, it is prayed that impugned FIR along with all consequential proceedings arising out therefrom may be quashed. The affidavit with regard to the compromise has been annexed with this petition. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant do not dispute the factum of compromise. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh versus State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. versus Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. reported in AIR 1992 SC 604 and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.44/2026 registered at Police Station Kishangarh, [2026:RJ-JP:12725] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-1749/2026] District Ajmer (Rajasthan) along with subsequent proceedings, is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /237