Nitish Kumar Sharma & another vs. State of H.P. Cr.MP(M) No. 762 of 2026. 06.05.2026. Present: Mr Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Jitender K. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the respondent/State. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that he does not want to file any reply to the application and he has no objection in case the present application is allowed. As per report, the Registry has mentioned that there is delay of 15 days in filing the revision petition. The delay has been properly explained in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, hence, the delay of 15 days in filing the revision is ordered to be condoned. The application stands disposed. Cr. Revision No. of 2026 (Filing No. 2296 of 2026) The delay of 15 days in filing the revision petition has been condoned as per order passed in Cr.MP(M) No. 762 of 2026. It be registered. Copy of the petition be supplied to the State. List after one week. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 06.05.2026 (ravinder).