BHAWANA D/O SHRI RAVI KUMAR SHARMA, v. RAMPRASAD PANCHAL S/O KAJODMAL,
CMA/1532/2025 · 2026-03-19
Sandeep Taneja
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5518 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5518 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:11863] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1532/2025 Bhawana D/o Shri Ravi Kumar Sharma, Aged About 7 Years, R/o Village Jirota, Khurd, Tehsil-Dausa, District-Dausa, Minor Through Natural Guardian And Father Ravi Kumar S/o Shri Ramesh Chand, R/o Village Jirota, Khurd, Tehsil-Dausa, District- Dausa. ----Appellant-Claimant Versus
1. Ramprasad Panchal S/o Kajodmal, R/o Jirota Khurd, Tehsil-Dausa, District-Dausa, Rajasthan (Owner)
2. Rajendra Panchal S/o Ramprasad, R/o Jirota Khurd, Tehsil-Dausa, District-Dausa, Rajasthan (Owner).
3. Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, Through Manager, E-8, EPIP, Riico Industrial Area, Sitapura, Jaipur. (Insurance Company). ----Respondents/Non-claimants For Appellant(s) : Dr. Ramdeo Arya for Ms. Sweta Pareek For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Jain through V.C.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Judgment 19/03/2026
1. This appeal has been filed under section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 by the appellant-claimant (for short "the claimant") against the judgment and award dated 13.12.2024 passed by the learned Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal, Dausa, District Dausa in claim case No.233/2023 whereby the claim petition filed by the claimant was partly allowed by awarding compensation of Rs.18,24,293/- along with interest @ 7.5% per annum.
[2026:RJ-JP:11863] (2 of 3) [CMA-1532/2025]
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the claimant and the respondent No.3- Insurance Company jointly submit that during pendency of this appeal, the parties have resolved their dispute amicably and accordingly a settlement has been arrived at between them by way of compromise.
3. A copy of memo of compromise duly signed by the learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Anirudh Singh, authorized signatory of Insurance Company, has been placed on record on
17.03.2026. On a specific query by this Court, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he is duly authorized by the appellant to execute the memo of compromise, which reads as under :-
"1. An additional lump-sum amount of Rs.18,00,000/- Eighteen lakhs only (including interest) shall be paid to the claimant by insurance company by depositing the same before tribunal concerns within 6 weeks from today i.e. from date of compromise order in full and final settlement of appeal with claimants. The said enhancement amount shall be disbursed to the claimants through saving bank account.
2. In case, the insurance company fails to deposit the said amount within 6 weeks from today i.e. from date of compromise order, claimants shall be entitled for interest at 6% PA from the date of compromise
order, till payment is made.
3. The appeal is agreed to be disposed of in terms of this compromise."
4.
Learned counsel for both the parties jointly pray that the present appeal be disposed of in light of the compromise arrived at between the parties.
5. Considering the submission of learned counsel for both the parties and memo of compromise, it is directed that Insurance Company shall pay a sum of Rs.18,00,000/- in all, to the claimant, in addition to the amount already awarded by the learned Tribunal
[2026:RJ-JP:11863] (3 of 3) [CMA-1532/2025] within a period of six weeks, failing which the above amount shall carry interest @6% per annum.
6. Accordingly, the impugned judgment and award dated 13.12.2024 is modified. The terms of memo of compromise shall be treated as an integral part of this order.
7. The instant appeal is disposed of in the above terms.
8. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SANDEEP TANEJA),J TN/76