GYANTA CHOUDHARY W/O JEETRAM JAT D/O RAMRATAN CHOUDAHRY v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/439/2026 · 2026-03-24
Anil Kumar Upman
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5517 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5517 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:12450] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 439/2026
1. Gyanta Choudhary W/o Jeetram Jat D/o Ramratan Choudahry, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Gordhanpura, Dis- trict Tonk, Rajasthan-304504
2. Jeetram Jat Son of Shri Kailash Jat, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Gram Sukhpura, Post Balunda Tehsil Dooni, Baloonda, Deoli, District Tonk, Rajasthan-304802 ----Petitioners Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
2. Superintendent of Police, District Tonk, Rajasthan.
3. Station House Officer Police Station Zirana, District Tonk (Raj.)
4. Station House Officer Police Station Nagar Fort, District Tonk (Raj.)
5. Ramratan Chaudhary, Son of Ramswaroop Chaudhary, Residents of Village Govardhanpura, Tehsil Peeplu, District Tonk (Father)
6. Ramswaroop Chaudhary, Son of Unknown, Residents of Village Govardhanpura, Tehsil Peeplu, District Tonk (Grandfather)
7. Padamchand Chaudhary, Son of Ramswaroop, Residents of Village Govardhanpura, Tehsil Peeplu, District Tonk (Uncle)
8. Kaidar, Son of Ramdayal, Residents of Village Govardhan- pura, Tehsil Peeplu, District Tonk (Uncle)
9. Shyoji, Son of Unknown, Residents of Village Govardhan- pura, Tehsil Peeplu, District Tonk (Uncle)
10. Ashok Kumar, Son of Shyoji, Residents of Village Govard- hanpura, Tehsil Peeplu, District Tonk (Brother)
11. Alok, Son of Shyoji, Residents of Village Govardhanpura, Tehsil Peeplu, District Tonk (Brother)
12. Madhu Devi, Wife of Mukesh, Residents of Village Govard- hanpura, Tehsil Peeplu, District Tonk
13. Santosh, Wife of Ramratan, Residents of Village Govard- hanpura, Tehsil Peeplu, District Tonk
[2026:RJ-JP:12450] (2 of 3) [CRLW-439/2026]
14. Ramnaresh, Son of Unknown (Brother), Resident of Vil- lage Gulabpura, District Tonk
15. Bhagchand, Son of Unknown (Brother), Resident of Vil- lage Bhawanipura, Diggi, Malpura, District Tonk
16. Tulsi Ram, Son of Unknown (Maternal Uncle), Resident of Palai, Tehsil Niwai, District Tonk. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Choudhary with Ms. Manisha Yogi For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 24/03/2026
1. Defects pointed out by the registry are overruled.
2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel.
3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.5 to 16 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Akhil Bhartiya Arya Samaj Mandir Trust S 22, Balanath Nagar, Dadi Ka Phatak, Jaipur, Rajasthan on 12.03.2026 and same has been registered before the Office of Marriage Officer, Nagar Nigam Jaipur. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this
[2026:RJ-JP:12450] (3 of 3) [CRLW-439/2026] petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.5 to 16 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection.
5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are
directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.4-Station House Officer, Police Station Nagar Fort, District Tonk (Raj.) and respondent No.4 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.
6. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /355