Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5516 (BOM)

SUNITA RAMNATH KANDE AND ORS. v. MANAGER, TATA MOTORS LTD., LUCKNOW AND ANR.

CA/7469/2026 · 2026-08-29

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 902ca7469.26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 902 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7469 OF 2026 IN FA/30/2013 Sunita Ramnath Kande And Ors. .....Petitioners VERSUS Manager, Tata Motors Ltd., Lucknow And Anr. .....Respondents Mr. Shaikh Sohail Yusuf, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. M. R. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Respondent CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATE : 29th AUGUST, 2026 PER COURT : 1. The present Application is filed by the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 in First Appeal No. 30/2013. Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 are the original claim Petitioners in MACP No. 581/2007 out of which said Appeal arises. The Appeal preferred by the Appellant-insurance company came to be allowed vide judgment and award dated 14-08- 2014. However, the Appellant-insurance company is directed to honour the claim and recover the amount from the owner of the vehicle i.e. Respondent No. 5 in the Appeal. 2. In view of above, the Application for withdrawal of the amount is allowed. 1 of 2 2026:BHC-AUG:39549 (2) 902ca7469.26 3. Applicant No. 4 is permitted to withdraw the amount of compensation with respect to her share along with accrued interest, if any. [ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. ] VishalK/902ca7469.26 2 of 2