Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 55114 (MAD)

K.MUTHYAMMAL v. The Tahsildar

WP/28623/2026 · 2026-07-23

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 28623 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 28623 of 2026 K.Muthyammal W/O.Karupanna Naicker Res.at Raman Kadu Nachipatti villge, Rasipuram Taluk Vennandur Post, Namakkal District ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tahsildar Karimangalam Taluk Dharmapuri District 2. The Revenue Divisional officer Palacode Taluk Dharmapuri District ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 21.1.2026 and consequently effect mutation of revenue records and issue patta in respect of Old survey Nos.1, 1B and 3/1 corresponding to New Survey Nos.1/1B1A,1/1B1B, 2/1A and 3/1A by incorporating the names of all persons entitled under the Jugement and Decree in O.S.No.171 of 2007 as confirmed in A.S.No.61/2017 within a time frame fixed by this Honble court For Petitioner(s): Ms.S.Rashmiga For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Prabakaran, Govt. counsel https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 28623 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 21.01.2026. 2. Mr.C.Prabakaran, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation dated 21.01.2026 before the respondent, requesting them for mutation of revenue records and issuance of patta, pertaining to the subject property, as per the judgement and decree passed in OS.No.171/2007 and as confirmed in AS.No.61/2017. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondents till date. Hence, this petition. 5. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner’s representation will be disposed of within a period of 6 weeks and hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 28623 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record. 7. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 1st respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 21.01.2026 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 23-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No NSA To 1. The Tahsildar Karimangalam Taluk Dharmapuri District 2. The Revenue Divisional officer Palacode Taluk Dharmapuri District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 28623 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. NSA WP No. 28623 of 2026 23-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis