Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:UHC:913-DB SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPSB No.230 of 2020 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Akshay Pradhan,
learned counsel for petitioner.
2. Mr. Pradeep Hairiya, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/respondents.
3. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought for the following relief:-
1. To issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to not to proceed with the departmental enquiry started pursuant to the charge-sheet dated 06.06.2019 in the light of the fact that the charge- sheet has already been set aside by the department itself vide
order dated
28.11.2019.
4. The relief claimed by the petitioner cannot be granted. Once charge-sheet is issued against the government servant, then the disciplinary enquiry must be brought to its logical end as early as possible.
5. Thus, the writ petition is thoroughly misconceived, therefore, the same is dismissed.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
13.02.2026 PN