Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:7295 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 2127 of 2026
Vikalp Kumar Singh, aged about 30 years, Son of Madhusudan Singh, Resident of Village Khap Saraun, P.O. Tetariain, P.S. Panki, District- Palamau.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… … Opposite Party ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Chandan Kumar Bhagat, Advocate
For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Abhay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate
---
02/17.03.2026
1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 27.01.2026 in connection with Panki P.S. Case No. 08 of 2026, for the alleged offence registered under Sections 318(2), 318(4), 349, 338, 336(3), 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, under Section 103, 104 of Trade Mark Act and under Section 5 of Environment Protection Act pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Palamau at Daltonganj.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Although, the petitioner is engaged in repair of mobiles. He has submitted that there is allegation of violation of Trade Mark Act and has Environment Protection Act.
Learned counsel submits that the co-accused namely Ranjit Kumar has been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate bench of this Court on 16.03.2026 in B.A. No. 2043 of 2026 and the petitioner is in custody since 27.01.2026. Learned counsel has also submitted that there is no criminal antecedent against the petitioner.
4.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer.
5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of allegation and that the petitioner claimed to
2026:JHHC:7295 2
be a mechanic of mobiles and the co-accused having been enlarged on bail and also that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Palamau at Daltonganj in connection with Panki P.S. Case No. 08 of 2026 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.
6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
7. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 17.03.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-18.03.2026