Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:16317] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 5625/2026 Umrav Lal S/o Late Sevaram, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Mator, Police Station Khairthal District Khairthal Tijara ( At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas, Alwar) ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Ms. Jaya Singh, Addl. SP, Khairthal Mr. Deshraj Sain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 17/04/2026
1. This second bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No.313/2025 registered at Police Station Khairthal District Khairthal, Tijara for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 316(5), 314, 3(5), 111(3) of BNS and Section 3,4,5 of Prize Cheat Funds and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 and Sections 3, 6, 21, 5, 23, 26 of Irregular Deposit Scheme Prohibition Act, 2019.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is a senior citizen, aged about approximately 61 years. It is submitted that the applicant is in behind the bars ever since 31.12.2025; charge-sheet has been filed and the matter is triable by First Class Magistrate. It is also submitted that co-accused
[2026:RJ-JP:16317] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5625/2026] Naresh Kumar @ Narendra has been enlarged on bail by Co- ordinate Bench of this Court. It is further submitted that the applicant has no role to play and he is to be placed at a lower pedestal, then the main co-accused who are directors and despite the said fact the main accused have been enlarged on bail.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the second bail application.
4. Ms. Jaya Singh, Additional Superintendent of Police has marked her presence. She has submitted that the applicant and the concerned entity have taken money from poor investors who are piteous labourers on daily wages at a lucrative rate of 24% against market rate of 12.5%. The amount involved in the instant matter as investigated to be around Rs. 500 Crores; 103 complaints have come forward; applicant is father of Directors and has given undue influence and reflected his trust being a retired teacher to get the money invested on high rates.
5. Considering the scam which is involved, considering that co- accused who was enlarged on bail, the Co-ordinate Bench has not considered the multifariousness of the case and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case, as enormous amount is being included, this Court is not inclined to entertain the second bail application.
6. Accordingly, second bail application is dismissed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /167