2026:UHC:4006 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No. 908 of 2026 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Digvijay Singh Bisht, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mrs. Meenakshi Sharma and Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. By the instant petition, the petitioners Anisha D/o Prabhat Kumar Singh and Priyanshu Verma S/o Anoop Verma are praying for adequate protection from local administrations since there is regular threat from the respondent no. 3 & 4 who are the parents of the petitioner no.1. 4. Both the petitioners are present in Court and are identified by their counsel. 5. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that both the petitioners are major and they known to each other since last seven years and they completed their MBA course together in the same institution and both are doing job in the same company and as on date they are residing at Haldwani. In support of age the Aadhaar Card have been enclosed. It is also contended that both the petitioners are major and they were in love with each other and now married on 11.05.2026 at Naitik Vaidik Sanskar Samiti, which is a registered organization and their marriage is also registered in the office of Sub Registrar, Registration of Marriage on 12.05.2026. The marriage registration certificate is also enclosed as Annexure-2. 2026:UHC:4006 6. Mrs. Meenakshi Sharma, the learned A.G.A. has not disputed on their age as well as their marriage since the marriage certificate is also enclosed. 7. Taking into consideration that both the petitioners are major and they were married on 11.05.2026, this Court is of the view that if there is any threat perception from the respondent no. 3 and 4 the State is under legal obligation to ensure their safety. 8. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of finally with the direction to the Senior Superintendent of Police, respondent no.2 to assess the threat perception if any and if he comes to the conclusion that there is any threat perception to the petitioners, he shall take appropriate steps. Simultaneously the S.H.O. concerned shall also call upon the respondent nos. 3 and 4 and advise them not to take the law in their hands. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 21.05.2026 Nahid 2026:UHC:4006