SRI SUBHASH S/O VEERUPAXGOUDA HIREGOUDRA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.P/100486/2025 · 2026-02-19
V Srishananda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5506 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5506 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2617 CRL.P No. 100486 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100486 OF 2025 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI SUBHASH S/O VEERUPAXAGOUDA HIREGOUDRA AGE. 61 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. ROTTIGAWAD VILLAGE TQ. KUNDGOL, DIST. DHARWAD-581195.
2.
SMT. NAGAMMA W/O SUBHASH HIREGOUDRA AGE. 50 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. ROTTIGAWAD VILLAGE, TQ. KUNDGOL, DIST. DHARWAD-581195. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. SUNITHA P. KALASOOR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY KUNDAGOL POLICE STATION, R/BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD, PIN 580011.
2.
SRI BASAYYA S/O FAKKIRAYYA STAVARMATH AGE. 54 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. ROTTIGAWAD VILLAGE TQ. KUNDGOL, DIST. DHARWAD-581195 PRESENTLY RESIDING AT C/O N. NAGARAJARADDI BUILDING, SURVEY NO.82, KOPPA VILLAGE, HULIMANGAL POST, TQ. ANEKAL, DIST. BANGALORE 560105. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTIALATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. GOURISHANKAR MOT, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.20 16:00:12 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2617 CRL.P No. 100486 of 2025
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C. (U/S.
528 OF BNSS, 2023) SEEKING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT IN PCR NO.
14/2016 DATED 25.04.2016 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 AND ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CC NO.11/2023 WHICH IS PENDING BEFORE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT KUNDGOL FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/SEC. U/SEC. 405, 420, 504, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC AGAINST ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 PRODUCED AT DOCUMENT NO.1 AND 2 RESPECTIVELY, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal. The memo reads as under:
"It is hereby submitted that the petitioners may kindly be allowed to withdraw the aforesaid petition with a liberty to challenge the order impugned herein before the jurisdictional district court in the interest of justice and equity.”
Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
KAV CT-CMU