Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5506 (ALL)

MADHUR SRIVASTAV @ MADHUR PRAKASH SRIVASTAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/21503/2026 · 2026-09-08

Jai Krishna Upadhyay, Siddhartha Varma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21503 of 2026 Court No. - 44 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 2. Although, the prayer made in this writ petition is to quash the First Information Report dated 19.07.2026 giving rise to Case Crime No. 389 of 2026, under Sections 352, 351(3), 303(2), 132 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 31(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act, Police Station - Kotwali, District - Azamgarh, but at the time when the matter is taken up learned counsel for the petitioner confines his relief to grant of protection under section 35 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. 3. We have perused the the First Information Report, which prima facie discloses commissioning of cognizable offence and, therefore, the prayer made to quash F.I.R. otherwise cannot be entertained in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of State of Telangana Vs. Habib Abdullah Jellani, (2017) 2 SCC 779 and Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra and Others, (2021) SCC Online SC 315. 4. We are of the view that no interference is warranted. 5. However, considering the fact that all offences mentioned in the present case are punishable with a term up to 7 years, the authorities are directed to ensure the procedure of arrest as per the guidelines of the Supreme Court enshrined in the case of Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ankur Rai, Vikalp Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Madhur Srivastav @ Madhur Prakash Srivastav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273. 6. It is expected of the police not to harass the petitioners till the conclusion of the investigation in any manner whatsoever. However, the petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation. 7. The writ petition, accordingly, is disposed of. September 9, 2026 S.K.S. CRLP No. 21503 of 2026 2 (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad