AMRITPAL SINGH ALIAS PANNU v. NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU
ABA/164/2026 · 2026-05-14
Rakesh Thapliyal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5504 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5504 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No.
Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or d ir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
ABA No. 164 of 2026 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mr. Abhishek Verma, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Shobhit Saharia, learned counsel for the respondent.
3. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that there is an apprehension of arrest by virtue of notice dated 06.05.2026, issued by the N.C.B. under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, copy of which is enclosed as annexure no. 1.
4. Apprehension of arrest of the applicant is thoroughly misconceived which is evident from the notice issued under Section 67 of the NDPS Act whereby an inquiry is being conducted in relation to Crime No. 05 of 2026 and since present applicant is the material witness, therefore, for recording his statement the notice has been issued.
5. In such view of the matter since the apprehension of the applicant is thoroughly misconceived, as only notice has been issued to ask explanation the instant anticipatory bail application is dismissed.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 14.05.2026 Parul