Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5504 (HP)

VIJAY SINGH AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/40/2026 · 2026-01-05

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos.40 & 110 of 2026 Decided on: 05.01.2026 1. CWP No. 40/2026 Vijay Singh and others …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents 2. CWP No. 110/2026 Babloo …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents in both the petitions. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matters are heard at this stage. 3. Petitioners grievances are that their representations of different dates (Annexure P-5) seeking applicability of Prem Lal versus State of H.P and 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 others2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/ competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioners of different dates (Annexure P-5) in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in the case of Prem Lal2 within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners. Both writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua January 05, 2026 Judge yogesh 2CWP No. 585/2024, decided on 27.11.2025.