Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5502 (UTT)

RANJIT KUMAR ALIAS RANJIT SINGH LADI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C528/1073/2026 · 2026-05-21

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS C528 No. 1073 of 2026 Hon ’ble Alok Mah r a, J. Mr. Kaushal Sah Jagati, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Ms. Pushpa Bhatt, learned Addl. Advocate General alongwith Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. The present criminal misc. application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to quash/ set-aside the order dated 12.05.2026 passed by the court of learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar in Criminal Revision Case No. 06 of 2026, Rupinder Kaur Vs. State and Another. 4. In this case, a complaint was filed under Section 173(3) of BNSS by respondent no. 2 which was rejected. Thereafter, respondent no. 2 preferred a revision against that order and Revisional Court set-aside the order of rejection passed by the Magistrate concerned and directed the Magistrate concerned to hold an inquiry afresh. Aggrieved by this order, the present criminal misc. application has been filed before this Court. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that applicant is innocent; that false and frivolous charges have been levelled against the applicant and that Revision Court, without appreciating the evidence on record set-aside the order of the learned Magistrate concerned and directed the Magistrate concerned to hold an inquiry afresh. 6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 7. Since, no order has been passed against the applicant, in such view of the matter, this Court finds no force in the submission made by learned counsel for the applicant and thus, this Court does not find any infirmity or illegality in the order dated 12.05.2026 passed by the court of learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar in Criminal Revision Case No. 06 of 2026, Rupinder Kaur Vs. State and Another. Hence, this Court does not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. 8. Accordingly, the criminal misc. application fails and is hereby dismissed. ( Alok Mah r a J.) 21.05.2026 Ujjwal