CRM-M-16174-202 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.247 CRM-M-16174-2026 Decided on : 09.04.2026 Daljit Singh alias Kaka ...... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...... Respondent CORAM : *** Present : Mr. Gaurav Kalsi, Advocate for the petitioner. *** , J (ORAL) !"#$ %& $!' ()*+)+( (,+-") ",(-#$+)+" +( . *(* /00 . + # %&1 . 2 1 13 . 1 ,0- . ("!!43.. 1. 5 %& " 6 . 6 MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.04.10 12:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CRM-M-16174-202 2 1 6 )!)*+)+(%&1 ()*+)+( 7 )! 5 %&0 / 1 .3 . / +()+)+(6 .3 8 ))++)+9 833'"+ )3+)+( / . 5. . 10 . 1 0 . / 1 6 110 5 . . .. He further submits that the petitioner is involved in one other case of similar nature meaning thereby he is a habitual offender. ( 5 . )(. )' :3 : MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.04.10 12:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CRM-M-16174-202 3 .: . 10 . 1 . 5 1 1 +8 & 9 . 1 5 ;78 0 . . . +8 & ' . 4 ,- . 5 <. 8 !"! # $ 1 . 1 4 ,- / . 31=3 "As observed by the High Court, merely on the basis of criminal antecedents, the claim of the second respondent cannot be rejected. In other words, it is the duty of the Court to find out the role of the accused in the case in which he has been charged and other circumstances such as possibility of fleeing away from the jurisdiction of the Court etc." MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.04.10 12:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CRM-M-16174-202 4 ! & 1 1 4 84 482 & 7 . * .. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No > =? 4$ MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.04.10 12:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh

DALJIT SINGH ALIAS KAKA v. STATE OF PUNJAB

Judgment text