CRL.OP.No.18030 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-07-2026 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL.OP.No.18030 of 2026 1. Rajasekar @ Rajasekaran 2. Guna @ Gunasekar ..Petitioner(s) Vs. 1. State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Kavundampalayam Police Station, Coimbatore District. (Crime No.378 of 2024) 2. Palanisamy 3. Vignesh Kumar @ Vinoth Kumar ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of the BNSS, praying to call for the records relating to the C.C.No.2458 of 2025, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court-I, Coimbatore and to quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.N.Arun Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajasekaran, (for R1) Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Crl.Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP.No.18030 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER This criminal original petition seeks to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.2458 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court-I, Coimbatore, on the ground of compromise between the parties. The parties are present before the Court and, on examination, stand by their compromise and do not want the case to proceed further. 2. The broad contours of the High Court's power to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. and Section 528 of the BNSS in respect of compromise of non-compoundable offences are laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another reported in (2012 10 SCC 303) and other subsequent judgments. 3. The brief facts leading to the instant case are that the dispute arose between an employer and his employees. When the employer accosted the employees working in his concern regarding the settlement of certain dues, stating that the payments had already been cleared and need not be paid https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP.No.18030 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 again, a wordy quarrel ensued. In the course of altercation, the accused allegedly abused and physically assaulted the employer. It is now submitted by both sides that they have amicably resolved their disputes and ironed out their differences. 4. Thus, it can be seen that this matter is a fit case for the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction to quash the case on compromise. 5. Accordingly, this Crl.O.P.No.18030 of 2026 stands allowed. The proceedings in C.C.No.2458 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court-I, Coimbatore, is quashed. 16-07-2026 Neutral Citation: No Sni https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP.No.18030 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. Sni To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Coimbatore. 2.The Inspector of Police, Kavundampalayam Police Station, Coimbatore District. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. CRL.OP.No.18030 of 2026 16-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis