PRAKASH VIDHYADHAR PAWAR v. MAJALI SEVA SAHAKARI SANGHA NIYAMITA
CRL.RP/100037/2026 · 2026-02-09
V Srishananda
Criminal Appealbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5499 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5499 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1888 CRL.RP No. 100037 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100037 OF 2026 (397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
PRAKASH VIDHYADHAR PAWAR AGE. 63 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. VANGAD, POST. MAJALI, KARWAR 581345 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. R.H. ANGADI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
MAJALI SEVA SAHAKARI SANGHA NIYAMITA MAJALI, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI. VASUDEV SADASHIV PAWAR, AGE. 57 YEARS, R/O. MAJALI, KARWAR 581345 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. PRANAV H. BADAGI, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/SEC.438 R/W 442 OF BNSS, SEEKING TO ALLOW THE REVISION PETITION AND CALL FOR RECORDS AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND
ORDER OF CONVICTION PASSED IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 127/2018, DATED 31.10.2025, BY PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, UTTARA KANNADA, KARWAR CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND
ORDER OF CONVICTION IN C.C.NO. 187/2016, DATED 16.10.2018, BY THE JMFC, II COURT KARWAR, AND CONSEQUENTLY ACQUIT THE ACCUSED FOR AN OFFENCE P/U/SEC. 138 OF NI ACT.
Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2026.02.11 15:04:16 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1888 CRL.RP No. 100037 of 2026
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
Joint memo is filed by the parties, signed by their respective Advocates. Joint memo reads as under:
“The advocate for the petitioner and respondent most humbly submit as under:
That, the petitioner has cleared off the entire loan amount to be payable to the respondent bank. To that effect copy of the letter issued by the respondent bank is already placed on record. In view of settlement arrived between parties, the above stated matter may be disposed off as settled. The order of conviction passed by Trial Court confirmed by the Appellate Court may kindly be set aside.” Placing the joint memo on record, revision petition stands
disposed of.
Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
KAV Ct-cmu LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 50