Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 54981 (MAD)

V.RAJENDRAN v. THE SUB REGISTRAR

WP/28967/2026 · 2026-07-22

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 28967 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 28967 of 2026 V.Rajendran S/o. Late Vaiyapuri, No.1/23 Sekkodi Village, Padi Post, Palacode, Taluk, Dharmapuri District -636 809 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Sub Registrar Sub Register Officer Papparapatti, Dharmapuri District -636 809 2. s.Vinothkumar S/o. Alexandar, Sekkodi Village, Padi Post, Palacode Taluk, Dharmapuri District -636 809 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ Of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records pertaining to the order of refusal in RFL/57/2026 dated 17.07.2026 passed by the 1st Respondent herein and quash the same consequently direct the Respondent to register the Sale Deed dated 17.07.2026 presented by the petitioner within a stipulated time. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Velmurugan For Respondent(s): Mr.Dominic S.David Government Counsel for R1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 28967 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER Challenging the order of refusal in RFL/57/2026 dated 17.07.2026 passed by the 1st respondent, this writ petition is filed. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that suit in O.S.No.95 of 2024 on the file of Sub Court, Palacode is pending between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent and the suit is filed by the 2nd respondent and 2 others for partition and other reliefs. He further submits that there is no interim injunction order forbearing the petitioner herein to register the sale deed. However, the respondent No.1/Sub Registrar, Papparapatti, refused to register the sale deed. Aggrieved over the same, this writ petition is filed praying to quash the refusal order dated 17.07.2026 and for a direction to register the sale deed dated 17.07.2026. 3. The learned Government counsel for the 1st respondent who takes notice submits that in the event of no injunction order passed by the court for registration of sale deed, there is no impediment in registering the sale deed subject to the re-presentation along with all necessary revenue records and requisite stamp duty and registration fees. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and since there is https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 28967 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 no injunction order passed in the pending suit between the parties restraining registration of the sale deed, the impugned order dated 17.07.2026 is set aside. The petitioner is directed to re‑present the sale deed dated 17.07.2026 for registration. In such event, the 1st respondent–Sub Registrar shall issue notice to the 2nd respondent and thereafter take necessary action in the matter, and register the sale deed forthwith in accordance with law. 5. This writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. 22-07-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No NVSRI To 1. The Sub Registrar Sub Register Officer Papparapatti, Dharmapuri District -636 809. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 28967 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. nvsri WP No. 28967 of 2026 22-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis