Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P(C) No.437 of 2026
Bhaktaram Pattanayak
….
Petitioner Mr. S. Mishra, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. S.S. Parida, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. S. Das, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
ORDER 09.01.2026
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties.
3. The present Writ Petition even though has been filed challenging the order of eviction issued under Annexure-6 and rejection of the prayer of the Petitioner to continue with the quarter vide communication dtd.29.12.2025 under Annexure-8, but in course of hearing, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Petitioner fairly contended that Petitioner is ready and willing to vacate the quarter in question by 28.02.2026 without fail.
4. Learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State on the other hand contended that if the Petitioner is ready p. 2p. 2 and willing to vacate the quarter by 28.02.2026, let him furnish an undertaking to that effect before the concerned authority.
5. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties and considering the submissions made, this Court while disposing the Writ Petition without interfering with the order of eviction, permits the Petitioner to file an undertaking in the shape of affidavit before Opposite Party No.4 to the effect that Petitioner will suo-moto vacate the quarter by 28.02.2026 without fail. On filing of such affidavit, Petitioner be allowed to continue in the quarter in question till 28.02.2026. If after 28.02.2026 Petitioner does not vacate the quarter suo-moto, appropriate action can be taken to evict the Petitioner from the quarter in question.
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Subrat
Judge