Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 54962 (MAD)

N. Ganesan v. The District Revenue officer

WP/27653/2026 · 2026-07-17

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 27653 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 27653 of 2026 N. Ganesan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Revenue officer, Villupuram District. 2. The Revenue Divisional officer, Vikkravandi Taluk, Villupuram District. 3. The Tahsildhar, Vikkravandi Taluk, Villupuram District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to effect the patta transfer based on the 1st respondent’s communication of Na.Ka.A3/ 3289 /2021 dated 11.09.2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Sudhakar For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Government’s Counsel ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to effect patta transfer. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27653 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a representation dated 27.01.2021 before the respondents seeking trasnfer of patta on his favour in respect of subject property. Pursuant thereto, the Village Administrative Officer and the Revenue Authorities conducted inspections and repeatedly recommended transfer of patta in favour of petitioner. The second respondent has also issued favourable reports on 30.06.2022, 04.09.2024 and 11.09.2025. Despite such recommendations, the respondents have not effected patta transfer. Hence, this writ petition. 3. Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government’s Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and submitted that the petitioner’s representation dated 27.01.2021 will be considered within a period of four weeks. 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 5. Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the second respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 27.01.2021, after issuing due notice to the petitioner and other aggrieved persons, if any and taking into consideration of the communication of the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27653 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 second respondent dated 11.09.2025, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 17-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM To: 1. The District Revenue officer, Villupuram District. 2. The Revenue Divisional officer, Vikkravandi Taluk, Villupuram District. 3. The Tahsildhar, Vikkravandi Taluk, Villupuram District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27653 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM WP No. 27653 of 2026 17-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis