Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5493 (JHR)

GUDDU KAPRI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./902/2026 · 2026-03-17

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:7225 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 902 of 2026 --------- Guddu Kapri, aged about 27 years, son of Mahavir Kapari @ Mahabir Kapari, resident of village Pindari, P.O. and P.S. Karmatar, District- Jamtara, Jharkhand. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Prathik, Advocate Mr. Abhishek Kr. Mishra, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. S.K.Tiwari, Spl.P.P. --------- 03/Dated:-17.03.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 319(2), 61(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) & 3 (5) of the BNS Act, and section 66(C) & 66(D) of the I.T.Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has committed no offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that nothing incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of this petitioner and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. He lastly submits that the petitioner is in custody since 19.11.2025; as such the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegations made against this petitioner coupled with the fact that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and considering the period of custody; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dumka, in connection with Tongra, P.S. Case No. 16 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 17.03.2026 Amardeep/- Uploaded 19.03.2026