Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5491 (JHR)

AMIT KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

W.P.(Cr.)/101/2025 · 2026-03-10

Gautam Kumar Choudhary

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:6292 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (Cr.) No. 101 of 2025 Amit Kumar, S/o Sri Sagar Ram Mahto, R/o RIMS Staff Quarter No.154, PO and PS- Bariyatu, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .. ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi. 3. The Officer-in-Charge, Bariyatu Police Station, Bariyatu, District- Ranchi. 4. Shambhu Shankar Guru, S/o Balak Lohra, R/o Village- Boreya, PO- Boreya, PS- Kanke, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. .. ... ...Respondent(s) ........... CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY ......... For the Petitioner (s) : Ms. Nishi Rani, Advocate Ms. A. Basundhra Raje, Advocate For the State : Ms. Omiya Anuska, AC to AAG-IA …... 03/ 10.03.2026. Heard, learned counsel for the parties. 1. Petitioner is the complainant in Complaint Case No.355 of 2012 and the same was disposed of vide judgment dated 12.06.2015 wherein judgment of conviction and sentence was awarded to the accused/ Respondent No.4. 2. Crl. Appeal No.129 of 2015 was preferred by the accused/ Respondent No.4 and the same was dismissed vide judgment dated 21.01.2016 and the order attained finality after dismissal of the Cr. Revision No.476 of 2016 vide order dated 24.06.2023. 3. The main grievance of the petitioner is that despite the judgment of conviction and sentence having attained finality, neither fine amount has been paid to the petitioner, nor Resp. No.4 was taken into custody to serve the sentence for realization of the fine amount. 4. This court is of the view that Petitioner has efficacious remedy before the learned Trial Court and may move it with the copy of the judgment passed in Crl. Appeal No.129 of 2015 and the copy of the order passed in Cr. Revision No.476 of 2016 to bring to its notice that judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Trial court has attained finality, but despite this the convict has not served the sentence and the fine amount has not been paid to the Petitioner. 5. In view of the alternative remedy, the instant Writ Petition (Crl.) is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the learned Trial Court for redressal of his grievance along with a copy of this order. 2026:JHHC:6292 2 Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned Trial Court at once for its compliance. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sandeep/ Uploaded