Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 54907 (MAD)

T.RAVI v. The District collector

WP/27003/2026 · 2026-07-15

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 27003 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 27003 of 2026 T.Ravi S/O.Thangalan Pillaiyar koil street Manalmedu village Puthali post, Uthiramerur Taluk kancheepuram District -631 106 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District collector Thiruvannamalai District Thiruvannamalai 2. The Tahsildar Vembakkam Taluk Thiruvannamalai District ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent herein to consider and dispose of petitioner application No.2025/0103/06/535080 can No.133030327008072 regarding charge of name in the patta relating to S.No.233/12 in Umayalpalayam village, Vembakkam Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District, within a limited time frame For Petitioner(s): Mr.G.Punniakoti For Respondent(s): Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, Govt. counsel https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27003 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's application dated 25.11.2025. 2. Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed an application dated 25.11.2025 before the 2nd respondent, requesting for name change in patta, pertaining to the subject property. However, the said application was not at all considered by the 2nd respondent till date. Hence, this petition. 5. In reply, the learned counsel for the official respondent would submit that the petitioner’s application will be disposed of within a period of 4 weeks and hence, she requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. 6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27003 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 7. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to consider the application filed by the petitioner dated 25.11.2025 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 15-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No NSA To 1. The District collector Thiruvannamalai District Thiruvannamalai 2. The Tahsildar Vembakkam Taluk Thiruvannamalai District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27003 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. NSA WP No. 27003 of 2026 15-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis