Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 54901 (MAD)

N.Karthikeyan v. the District Collector

WP/28637/2026 · 2026-07-23

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 28637 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 28637 of 2026 N.Karthikeyan S/o.Namachivayagounder, Pappankuttai thottam, Goundampalayam, Aandalur gate Post, Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. the District Collector Namakkal District. 2. The District Revenue officer, collectorate buildings, Namakkal 3. The Tahsildar Rasipuram taluk, Namakkal District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 26.12.2025 for rectification of revenue records and grant patta with respect to S.No.2/1 and S.No.2/4 in Rasipuram Village (Goundampalayam) Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District within stipulated time For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Arjun For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Prabakaran, Govt. counsel https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 28637 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.12.2025. 2. Mr.C.Prabakaran, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation dated 26.12.2025 before the respondent, requesting for rectification of revenue records and issuance of patta, pertaining to the subject property, in favour of the petitioner. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondents till date. Hence, this petition. 5. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner’s representation will be disposed of within a period of 8 weeks and hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 28637 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record. 7. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 2nd & 3rd respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 26.12.2025 and after issuing notice and affording an opportunity to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 23-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsa To 1. the District Collector Namakkal District. 2. The District Revenue officer, collectorate buildings, Namakkal 3. The Tahsildar Rasipuram taluk, Namakkal District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 28637 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa WP No. 28637 of 2026 23-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis