Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5490 (JHR)

SHISUDHAR SARDAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./11929/2025 · 2026-04-06

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:9545 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 11929 of 2025 Shisudhar Sardar, Son of Maliya Lal Sardar … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Gita Sardar, D/o: Late Purushottam Sardar … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra S. Singh, Advocate For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Arun Kr. Dey, Advocate For the Informant : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, Advocate --- 05/06.04.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 19.07.2025 in connection with Kowali P.S. Case No. 29 of 2025, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1289 of 2025, for the alleged offence registered under Sections 332(a), 117(2), 118(2), 109, 103(1), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jamshedpur. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the name of the petitioner is in the First Information Report, but it is only on the basis of suspicion. He also submits that there are altogether three victims and one them has succumbed to injuries, but so far as other two victims are concerned, they have not identified the petitioner as assailant. He has also submitted that the alleged weapon which is said to have been recovered, on his confession, has not been sent for examination by FSL. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State and the informant have opposed the prayer, but the fact that two surviving victims have not identified the petitioner is not in dispute. It is also not in dispute that the alleged weapons recovered have not been sent for examination by FSL. 2026:JHHC:9545 2 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, particularly the fact that the surviving two victims have not identified the petitioner as assailant, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Kowali P.S. case No. 29 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1289 of 2025 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 06.04.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-07.04.2026