[2026:RJ-JP:11408] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9238/2025 Amit S/o Ramaji, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Balapur, Police Station Bahadiya, District Shiwan, Bihar, Presently Talim/hanseera Colony, Hanuman Nagar, Kohhari Kalan, Police Station Tawadu, Haryana. (Presently Confined At Central Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chandra Shekhar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 18/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 101/2025 registered at Police Station Bhiwadi District Bhiwadi for the offence(s) under Sections 103(1) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family, aged about 26 years, having no criminal antecedents. It is submitted that the applicant and the victim (deceased) were colleagues and that the applicant was last seen with the victim with whom he was in a drunk state. It is next submitted that the said fact has been verified from the recovery of glass bottles from the place of incidence. Moreover, it is submitted that cause of death of the victim is head injury. Learned counsel further submits that the applicant is falsely implicated in the matter and that the applicant is not even named in the FIR. It is submitted that recoveries of [2026:RJ-JP:11408] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9238/2025] stone from which the said offence has taken place were also carried out from an open place that too at the belated stage. It is further submitted that the applicant is in custody ever since 11.02.2025. Learned counsel further submits that the conclusion of trial is likely to take a long time and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant behind bars till disposal of the case. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the instant bail application. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that accused- applicant is sole bread earner of the family, aged about 26 years; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicant; that the accused-applicant is in custody ever since 11.02.2025; that the accused-applicant is not named in the FIR, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Amit S/o Ramaji, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /15