Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5489 (PNJ)

KAMAL PAWAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

CRWP/4537/2026 · 2026-04-22

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-4537 IN THE (111) KAMAL PAW STATE OF CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. Constitution o official resp representation/ protect his lif petitioner is s against the res 2. submitted tha 08.04.2026 Police, Ludhia 4537-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH L PAWAR Versus PUNJAB AND ORS. HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. Rahul Rana, Advocate for the Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D ***  HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been fi tion of India seeking issuance of a w respondents to consider and tation/complaint dated 08.04.2026 su his life and liberty from the hands o r is seeking direction to official re e respondent No.4. At the very outset, learned co d that the petitioner has recently (Annexure P-5) before respond udhiana raising his grievances as men NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH CRWP-4537-2026 O&M) Date of decision : 22.04.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA for the petitioner nior DAG, Punjab een filed under Article 226 of the of a writ of mandamus directing the and take action on the 026 submitted by the petitioner to ands of respondent No.4. Further, ial respondents to register an FIR ed counsel for the petitioner has ecently filed a representation on espondent No. 2-Commissioner of as mentioned in the present petition 2026 oner f the g the the er to rther, FIR has on r of AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.23 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-4537 but the same thereon. He f satisfied if Commissioner filed by the pe 3. 4. notice on beha be done in due her during the 5. commenting a disposed of at aforesaid repre within a perio accordance wi  22.04.2026 Amit Sharma 4537-2026 (O&M) (1) same has not yet been considered a He further submitted that at this st if appropriate directions are is sioner of Police, Ludhiana to decide the petitioner and take necessary actio Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior n behalf of the respondents-State and in due course. Let a complete set of ng the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer ma ting anything on the merits of the of at this stage with a direction to r d representation dated 08.04.2026 (A period of one month from today, by nce with law and take necessary action Whether speaking/reasoned:    ered and no action has been taken this stage, the petitioner would be are issued to respondent No.2- decide the aforesaid representation y action thereon. Senior DAG, Punjab, has advance te and submits that the needful will set of the paper-book be supplied to yer made by the petitioner, without f the case, the present petition is n to respondent No. 2 to decide the (Annexure P-5) of the petitioner day, by passing a speaking order in action, if so required. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE  ned:- Yes/No   aken d be - ation ance will ed to thout n is e the ioner er in AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.23 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.