SUJEET GHOSH ALIAS SUJIT KR GHOSH ALIAS SUJIT GHOSH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./1360/2026 · 2026-03-10
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5488 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5488 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[ 2026:JHHC:6279 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. no. 1360 of 2026
Sujeet Ghosh @ Sujit Kr. Ghosh @ Sujit Ghosh, aged about 43 years, son of Late Tarapad Ghosh, resident of Village Ramchandrapur, P.O. and P.S. Gamharia, District Seraikella Kharsawan, Jharkhand.
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Adv. For the State : Mr. Fahad Allam, Addl. PP
02 / 10.03.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sessions Trial No. 207 of 2025 arising out of Gamharia P. S. case no. 76 of 2025 instituted under Section 109(1), 3(5), 126 (2), 115 (2) of BNS, 2023.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner attempted to commit murder of Sukhram Tudu. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and charge sheet has already been submitted against the petitioner in this case but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that because of the land dispute between the parties, the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 30.07.2025, as mentioned in para 14 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witnesses of the case or victims or
their family members in any manner during trial of the case, hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Seraikella-Kharsawan in connection with Sessions Trial No. 207 of 2025 arising out of Gamharia P. S. case no. 76 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case or the victim or their family members in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Dated 10.03.2026
Smita/-