V.Krishnaveni v. The State of Tamil Nadu represented by the Inspector of Police
CRL OP/19337/2026 · 2026-07-21
D Bharatha Chakravarthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 54868 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 54868 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 19337 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP No. 19337 of 2026 V.Krishnaveni ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State of Tamil Nadu represented by the Inspector of Police Taluk Police Station, Erode. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: This criminal original petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to set aside the docket order in Crl.MP. ATW 2022000/627 C 20250000 passed on 15.05.2025 by the Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Erode and further directing the learned Judicial Magistrate to take up the petition filed u/s 223 of R/w 175(3) BNSS on file and issue direction to the respondent to register F.I.R. on the complaint of the petitioner dated on 07.01.2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.Tamilnidhi For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajasekaran Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) ORDER The prayer is made to set aside the docket order dated 15.05.2025 in Crl.MP. ATW 2022000/627 C 20250000 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Erode. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 19337 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2.The petitioner made a strange complaint before the learned Judicial Magistrate stating that his father went missing on 05.04.2002, the learned Judicial Magistrate found that no cognizable offence is disclosed and as such rejected the complaint. 3.Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, the grievance is that the petitioner’s father has been missing from the year 2002 and they have been informally searching all these years. Now, when property issues are involved, the petitioner wants to approach the civil Court for declaration etc., The fact that the petitioner never gave a complaint comes in the way and therefore, now belatedly they are giving the complaint. In view thereof, in spite of the delay, though not much can be done to trace out the missing person, let a man missing complaint be registered by the respondent police and due attempts as per procedure by releasing posters, etc., can be made to trace out the person. If they are not able to trace out, they can file a final report as undetected. Therefore, the criminal original petition is accordingly ordered directing the respondent police to register a man missing case within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the web copy of the order.
21-07-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No sms https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 19337 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1.The Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Erode
2. The Inspector of Police Taluk Police Station, Erode. 3.The Public prosecutor High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 19337 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. sms CRL OP No. 19337 of 2026 21-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis