Agni Arasu v. State rep. by The Inspector of Police,
CRL OP/19332/2026 · 2026-07-21
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 54867 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 54867 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 19332 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 19332 of 2026 Agni Arasu S/o.Elangovan, Tower No.27, 164, DLF Garden City, Thazhambur, Kelambakkam, Chengalpattu District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State rep. By The Inspector of Police, SIPCOT Police Station, Krishnagiri District. Crime No.264 of 2026 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of BNSS, praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.264 of 2026 on the file of the Inspector of Police, SIPCOT Police Station, Krishnagiri District and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.G.Vinodh Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.N.Palanivel Government Advocate (Crl.Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 19332 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offences under Sections 8(c), 21(b) of NDPS Act 1985 in Crime No.264 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was in illegal possession of 80.91 grams of Cocaine. Hence the complaint. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court and hence, prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), appearing for the respondent Police, reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the investigation is still pending. He would further submit that, if the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail, there is every likelihood of his absconding and indulging in similar offences in future. Therefore, he vehemently opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 19332 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5
5. I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions. 6. From the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), if anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner, it is likely to have an adverse impact on society. Further, if anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner for the offence under NDPS case, it would shock the conscience of the society.
Although the petitioner was found in possession of an intermediate quantity of cocaine, considering the nature of the allegations and the interest of society at large, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 21-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No MFA https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 19332 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 To
1. The Inspector of Police, SIPCOT Police Station, Krishnagiri District. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 19332 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. MFA CRL OP No. 19332 of 2026 21-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis