Crl.O.P.No.19378 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 21.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.19378 of 2026 S.P.Senthilkumar ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by, The Inspector of Police, T3, Korattur Police Station, Chennai-600 080. (Crime No.Not known of 2026) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.Not known of 2026 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.A.M.Ayyadurai For Respondent : Ms.R.S.Indira Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.19378 of 2026 O R D E R The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 118 and 351(3) of BNS, 2023, (Sections 326 and 506(II) of IPC) in Crime No.not known of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that in respect of parking of vehicle, there was a dispute between the petitioner and the father of the defacto complainant, due to which, the petitioner attacked the father of the defacto complainant and abused him in filthy language. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is an practicing Advocate in Madras High Court and he is ready to co-operate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and, submitted that FIR in 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.19378 of 2026 Crime No.364 of 2026 was registered against the petitioner for the offence under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2) and 351(2) of BNS, 2023. He further submitted that the injured got discharged from the hospital and the petitioner has no previous case. However, he opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Taking into consideration the totality of the circumstances, and the fact that injured got discharged from the hospital and that the petitioner has no previous case, this Court is of the firm view that, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. Hence, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail, subject to certain conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions: 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.19378 of 2026 (a) If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled; (b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity; (c) The petitioner shall report before the respondent Police as and when required for interrogation; (d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; (e) If the petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act. 21.07.2026 ssb 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.19378 of 2026 To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur. 2.The Inspector of Police, T3, Korattur Police Station, Chennai-600 080. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.19378 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. ssb Crl.O.P.No.19378 of 2026 21.07.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis