SHRI MANJUNTH S/O YALLAPPA GADEPPANAVAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS
CRL.P/101105/2022 · 2026-02-06
V Srishananda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5484 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5484 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1745 CRL.P No. 101105 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 06TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION No.101105 OF 2022 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
1.
SHRI MANJUNTH S/O YALLAPPA GADEPPANAVAR AGE. 38 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE JOB R/O VANASHI NAGAR, SATUR, DHARWAD PIN-580009.
2.
SHRI YALLAPPA S/O SHIVAPPA GADEPPANAVAR AGE. 65 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O VANASHI NAGAR, SATUR, DHARWAD PIN-580009.
3.
SMT. SANKAVVA W/O YALLAPPA GADEPPANAVAR AGE. 65 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O VANASHI NAGAR, SATUR, DHARWAD PIN-580009. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. T.R. PATIL,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS POLICE INSPECTOR OF MAHILA P.S. HUBBALLI, REPRESENTED BY S.P.P.
HIGH COURT BUILDING, DHARWAD-580011.
2.
SMT SUNANDA W/O MANJUNATH GADEPPANAVAR AGE. 28 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. VANASHRI NAGAR, SATTUR DHARWAD TQ. HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD, PIN- 580026. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. S.B. DODDAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench.
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1745 CRL.P No. 101105 of 2022
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE CHARGE SHEET AND ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CC NO.608/2021 (ARISING OUT OF HUBBALLI MAHILA P.S. CRIME NO.4/2021) DATED 22.06.2021, PENDING 2 ND ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DHARWAD FILED AGAINST THESE PETITIONERS FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 498A, 504, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC AND U/S 3 AND 4 OF DP ACT, IN SO FOR THESE PETITIONERS HEREIN/ARRAYED AS ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 3 RESPECTIVELY IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
After addressing the arguments for some, learned counsel for the petitioners files the memo which reads as under:
“That the petitioners in the above case most humbly pray that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above petition with a liberty to raise/urge all the contention before the trail Court in the proceedings, thus the above petition may be dismissed as withdraw, in the above case, in the interest of justice.”
2. Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm Ct-cmu LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 26