CRL OP No. 19460 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP No. 19460 of 2026 1. Aravinth @ Aravindraj S/o. Venkatesan, No.2/112, Uthukattamman Kovil Street, Thaiyur, Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu. 2. Sathan s/o. vijiyarankan, Uthukottamman Kovil Street, Chennama Nagar, Thaiyur, Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu. 3. Viji@Vijayan S/o. Duraikannu, Uthukottamman Koil Street, Chennama Nagar, Thaiyur, Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu. 4. Gopi@ Gopinath S/o. Dhatchanamoorthi, No.2/110, Uthukattamman Kovil Street, Thaiyur, Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State Represented by The Inspector of Police E-8, Kelambakkam Police Station, Chengalpattu District. Crime No. 710 of 2021. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19460 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. Naveen Kumar S/o. Thangavelu, Oversion Road, Panruti, Cuddalore-607 106. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under Sec.528 of B.N.S.S. 2023, praying to call for the records in pleased to call for the records in Crime No.710 of 2021 on the file of The Inspector of Police, The Inspector of Police, E-8, Kelambakkam Police Station, Chengalpattu District quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr. M.Jaisingh For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajasekaran, Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) for R1 ORDER 1. This Criminal Original Petition seeks to quash the F.I.R. in Crime No.710 of 2021 on the file of the Inspector of Police, E-8 Kelambakkam Police Station, Chengalpattu District for alleged offences under Sections 448, 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of I.P.C. on the ground of compromise between the parties. The parties are present before the court and, on examination, stand by their compromise and do not want the case to proceed further. 2. The broad contours of the High Court's power to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.p.c. and Section 528 of the BNSS in respect of compromise of non-compoundable offences are laid down by the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19460 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Gian Singh -Vs- State of Punjab and Another (2012 10 SCC 303) and other subsequent judgments. 3. The gist of facts leading to the instant case are that when the de facto complainant, who is the shop owner was about to close the shop, at that time, the accused persons entered the shop and picked up quarrel asking for certain items and subsequently they have also attacked the de facto complainant. Subsequently the parties have ironed out their differences. 4. Thus, it can be seen that this matter is a fit case for the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction to quash the case on compromise. 5. Accordingly, this Crl.O.P. No. 19460 of 2026 stands allowed. The F.I.R. in Crime No. 710 of 2021 on the file of the Inspector of Police, E-8 Kelambakkam Police Station, Chengalpattu District stands quashed. 22-07-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No RPP To 1. The Inspector of Police E-8, Kelambakkam Police Station, Chengalpattu District. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19460 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY J. RPP CRL OP No. 19460 of 2026 22-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis