HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 10274 of 2026 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Anurag Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent no.5 and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondent no.5 submits that the petitioner has remedy to approach the competent authority under Section 211 of the Uttar Pradesh Municipality Act, 1916. 3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid submissions and prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to approach the competent authority under Section 211 of the Uttar Pradesh Municipality Act, 1916. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority under the provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Municipality Act, 1916. March 18, 2026 Sachin Mishra Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aditya Kumar Arya, Qazi Vakil Ahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anurag Tripathi, C.S.C. (Garima Prashad,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Mohd Nishat @ Bilal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 11 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad