Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 54743 (MAD)

VALARMATHI v. The commissioner of Land Reforms

WP/1442/2026 · 2026-07-17

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 1442 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 1442 of 2026 1. Valarmathi W/o.Sivakumar, No.4/197C, Salaithottam, Kasigoundan Pudur, VTC Kalangal Post, Coimbatore District. 2. santhi W/o.Senthilkumar, No.4/197C, Salaithottam, Kasigoundan Pudur, VTC Kalangal Post, Coimbatore District. 3. Anandkumar S/o.late Marppa Gounder, Door No.12/55, Marudhadevar Street, Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District- 641 402. 4. Lakshmi W/o.late Marappa Gounder, Door No.12/55, Marudhadevar Street, Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District- 641 402. 5. Malliga W/o.Subramaniam, Door No.10/28, Kuppa Naicker Street, Sulur Village, Sulur Taluk, __________ Page1 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 1442 of 2026 Coimbatore District- 641 402. 6. Selvaraj S/o.Chinna Kannu, Door No.12/93 , Marudhadevar Street, Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District- 641 402. 7. Sivagami W/o.Late Subramaniam, Door No.12/94, Marudhadevar Street, Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District- 641 402. 8. Akila D/o.Late Subramaniam, Door No.12/94, Marudhadevar Street, Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District- 641 402. 9. Savitha D/o.Late Subramaniam, Door No.12/94, Marudhadevar Street, Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District- 641 402. 10.Kanchana W/o.Maruthachalamurthi, No.9/167, Adapputhottam, Jeeve Street, Urmandapalayam, Vellakinaru, Coimbatore district- 641 402. ..Petitioner(s) Vs __________ Page2 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 1442 of 2026 1. The commissioner of Land Reforms Chepauk, Ezilagam, Chennai-05. 2. The District Collector Coimbatore District, Coimbatore. 3. The REvenue Divisional Officer Coimbatore South, Coimbatore- 641 018. 4. The Tahsildar Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to issue patta and to hand over peaceful and vacant possession of the land from the survey Numbers 393/1and 393/2, instead of survey Numbers 395 (p) and 397 (P) , situated at kalangal village, Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District as per the assignment order in Na.Ka.MR. IV/ 558/ 17-70/A4 dated 30.04.2004 granted by the then Assistant Commissioner of Land Reforms, erode, Now held by the 3rd respondent, and pursuant to the order of this Court in W.P. No. 22119 of 2024 dated 11.12.2024. __________ Page3 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 1442 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): Ms. L.Karthiga For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan Government Counsel ORDER The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioners’ representation dated 27.12.2025. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners are residents of Kalangal Village, Palladam Taluk, and are eligible assignees under the Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act, 1961. It is further submitted that the petitioners were duly allotted surplus lands measuring between 1.20 and 1.33 acres each, by virtue of formal Assignment Orders dated 30.04.2004 However, despite the assignment, possession and patta were never issued. Following G.O.(Ms.) No. 1024 dated 31.12.2025, the authorities were required to allot alternative surplus lands. Though the petitioners submitted representation dated 27.12.2025 seeking issuance of patta and delivery of possession, no action was taken. Aggrieved by the inaction, the petitioners have __________ Page4 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 1442 of 2026 filed the present writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to allot alternative surplus lands, issue patta, and hand over peaceful possession in accordance with the assignment orders. 3. In response, Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government Counsel submitted that the representation of the petitioners dated 27.12.2025 would be considered by the respondents and appropriate orders would be passed thereon on merits and in accordance with law. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made on either side, this Court, without going into the merits of the matter, directs the respondents to consider the petitioners’ representation dated 27.12.2025. The petitioners are directed to submit all relevant documents along with any binding judicial precedents passed by this Court to the respondents. Upon receipt of the same, the respondents, after issuing prior notice to the petitioners as well as the private respondents herein and affording them a fair opportunity of a personal hearing, shall pass a reasoned speaking order on merits and in accordance with law. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. __________ Page5 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 1442 of 2026 5. With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 17-07-2026 Asi To 1. The commissioner of Land Reforms Chepauk, Ezilagam, Chennai-05. 2. The District Collector Coimbatore District, Coimbatore. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Coimbatore South, Coimbatore- 641 018. 4. The Tahsildar Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District. __________ Page6 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 1442 of 2026 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. Asi WP No. 1442 of 2026 17-07-2026 __________ Page7 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis