Daya Srinivasan v. Nirmala Krishnaswamy and 3 others
A/2193/2026 · 2026-07-24
A D Maria Clete
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 54740 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 54740 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
A No. 2193 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE A No.2193 of 2026 in CS NO. 228 OF 2004 Daya Srinivasan ..Applicant(s) Vs 1.Nirmala Krishnaswamy 2.Kala Doraisamy 3.M/s.P.A. Construction, Rep. By K.Ponnuswamy, P.A. Building, 42, Venkatakrishna Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai 600 028. 4.Palanisamy Apartment Owner’s Association, Rep. By its Secretary, Old Door Nos.81, 82, 83/New Door Nos.181 to 189, Luz Church Road, Chennai 600 004. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER – This Application is filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S. Rules, read with Order VI rule 17 and Section 151 of C.P.C., to amend the plaint by adding para 26 d to include “of partition by metes and bounds and separate possession of the 1st plaintiffs 1/3rd share in plaint schedule D property to be handed over to the plaintiff” and consequently, amend para 25 and memo of valuation of the plaint to include “The plaintiffs further value the prayer in Para 26 d under Section 37(2) of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act, 1965 at Rs.3,99,08,000/- and pays a Court fees of Rs.10,000/-?” and consequently amend prayer “d and e” as “e and f”. __________ Page1 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
A No. 2193 of 2026 For Applicant(s): Mr.R.Parthasarathy, Senior Counsel for Ms.Rekha S. For Respondent(s): Mr.P.R.Raman, Senior Counsel for Mr.A.Umasankar O R D E R This application has been filed to amend the plaint by adding para 26 d to include “of partition by metes and bounds and separate possession of the 1st plaintiffs 1/3rd share in plaint schedule D property to be handed over to the plaintiff” and consequently, amend para 25 and memo of valuation of the plaint to include “The plaintiffs further value the prayer in Para 26 d under Section 37(2) of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act, 1965 at Rs.3,99,08,000/- and pays a Court fees of Rs.10,000/-?” and consequently amend prayer “d and e” as “e and f”. 2.When this matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this application as the parties have agreed for settlement and has made endorsement to that effect. 3.Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn. 24-07-2026 GSA (1/4) __________ Page2 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
A No. 2193 of 2026 DR.A.D.MARIA CLETE J. GSA A No.2193 of 2026 in CS NO.
228 OF 2004 24-07-2026 (1/4) __________ Page3 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis