ABDUL KARIM LASKAR AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS
WP(C)/2244/2026 · 2026-05-03
Manish Choudhury
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5474 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5474 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010047782026
2026:GAU-AS:6034
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2244/2026 ABDUL KARIM LASKAR AND ANR S/O LATE MASARAF ALI LASKAR, VILL. ALGAPUR PT I, P.O. KALIBARI BAZAR, P.S. ALGAPUR, DIST. HAILAKANDI, ASSAM, PIN 788150 2: ABUL HUSSAIN LASKAR S/O- LATE TAZAMUL ALI LASKAR VILLAGE- ALGAPUR PT-I P.O. KALIBARI BAZAR P.S. ALGAPUR DISTRICT- HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 78815 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS REPRESENTTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 6 2:THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PANJABARI ROAD JURIPAR GUWAHATI- 37 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER HAILAKANDI P.O. AND DISTRICT- HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788151 4:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Page No.# 2/3 HAILAKANDI ZILLA PARISHAD P.O. AND DISTRICT- HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788151 5:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER ALGAPUR DEVELOPMENT BLOCK P.O. KALIBARI BAZAR DISTRICT- HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788150 6:THE SECRETARY ALGAPUR-MOHANPUR GAON PANCHAYAT P.O.- KALIBARI BAZAR P.S. ALGAPUR DISTRICT- HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788150 7:KAIDUL HAQUE LASKAR S/O- NOOR UDDIN LASKAR VILLAGE- ALGAPUR PT-IV P.O. KALIBARI BAZAR P.S. ALGAPUR DISTRICT- HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788150 8:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE ALGAPUR POLICE STATION P.O. KALIBARIBAZAR P.S. ALGAPUR DISTRICT- HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 78815 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H I CHOUDHURY, H YEASMIN,MR. M DAS Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D., GA, ASSAM
Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 04.05.2026
Heard Mr.M. Das, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, P & RD for the respondent nos. 1, 2, 4, 5 & 6; and Ms. M. Barman, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 3 & 8. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties at some length, Mr. Das, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition in order to seek appropriate remedy permissible under the law. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Das, learned counsel for the petitioners, this writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal with the liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy permissible under the law.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant