Yerukala Pushpavathi, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/7453/2026 · 2026-07-12
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5465 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5465 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 13.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010133542026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY, THE 13th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 7453/2026 Between:
1. YERUKALA PUSHPAVATHI,, W/O Y. BOJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O D.NO.1/731-73, PEDDA HOSPITAL, YEMMIGANUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT- 518360.
2. YERUKALA MAREKKA,, W/O Y. HANUMANTHU, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
R/O D.NO.1/731-79, KOTHA HANUMAN COLONY, YEMMIGANUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT-
518360.
3. YERUKALA KAMALAMMA,, W/O Y. SURAIAH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O D.NO.1/731-85, GOVT. HOSPITAL, YEMMIGANUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT- 518360.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522 238.
2. THE YEMMIGANUR MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT- 518360.
3. THE TAHSILDAR, YEMMIGANUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT-
2
518360
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in issuing notice dt.04-03-2026 under R.O.C.No.2358/2012/G1 directing the Petitioners to vacate their absolute properties situated in Survey No.317 of Yemmiganur Village and Mandal, Yemmiganur Municipality, Kurnool District, each an extent of 24.83 Sq.Meters, 15.05 Sq.Meters and 14.55 Sq.Meters in Plot Nos.8, 7 and 2 respectively without paying compensation or without providing alternative accommodation, is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 19, 21 and more particularly 300- A of Constitution of India and consequently set aside the notice dt.04-03-2026 issued by the 2nd Respondent under R.O.C.No.2358/2012/G1 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to SUSPEND the operation of the notice dt.04-03-2026 issued by the 2nd Respondent under R.O.C.No.2358/2012/G1 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. A SYAM SUNDAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following:
3
Order:-
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the matter has become infructuous.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 13.07.2026 PNS
Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable ☑