[2026:RJ-JP:10163] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6018/2025 Ganesh Narayan Yadav S/o Nanuram Yadav, Aged About 58 Years, R/o 20, Kored Ki Dhani, Muhana, Tehsil Sanganer, Jaipur, (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor. 2. Smt. Anjali Singh W/o Shri Kamal Singh, R/o House No. 466, Barkat Nagar, Tonk Phatak, Jaipur (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Vaishnavi for Mr. Ashvin Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Vishnu Kumar Sharma, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 06/03/2026 1. Parties are present in person and they have been duly identified by their respective counsel. 2. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 BNSS, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.580/2024 registered at Police Station Muhana, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC along with all the subsequent proceedings arising out thereof. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that perusal of the FIR would reveal that the dispute between the parties is purely of [2026:RJ-JP:10163] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-6018/2025] civil and personal nature. Counsel submits that during pendency of the investigation, the petitioner has entered into a compromise with the complainant and the complainant does not want to pursue the impugned FIR. It is submitted that now, parties have settled their dispute amicably. It is submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition. It is further submitted that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the facts that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.580/2024 registered at Police Station Muhana, District Jaipur City (South) along with all the subsequent [2026:RJ-JP:10163] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-6018/2025] proceedings arising out thereof, is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /265