SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S 2026:UHC:3764 BA1 No. 598 of 2026 Abhijeet ....Applicant Vs. State of Uttarakhand ......Respondent Hon ’ble Ash ish Nait han i, J. Mr. Vaibhav Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. The present Bail Application has been moved by the Applicant—Abhijeet, S/o Shri Mani Mohan, R/o Peer Wali Gali, Arya Nagar, P.S. Kotwali Jwalapur, District Haridwar. The Applicant is in judicial custody in connection with FIR No. 39 of 2026, registered at Police Station SIDCUL, District Haridwar, for offences punishable under Sections 8, 22(c) and 60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 5. Learned counsel for the Applicant submitted that the Applicant was not carrying any contraband and has been falsely implicated in the present case by the police authorities concerned. It is further submitted that the Applicant is in judicial custody since 31.01.2026. Learned counsel for the Applicant further submits that the inventory report was prepared subsequently and there exists a discrepancy, inasmuch as the FIR number had already been mentioned while preparing the inventory report. It is also submitted that the alleged contraband shown to have been recovered from the Applicant is of non-commercial quantity. 6. Per contra, learned State Counsel opposed the bail application and submitted that there is no motive on the part of the prosecution to falsely implicate the present Applicant. 7. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the material available on record, this Court finds that there appears to be a discrepancy regarding the mention of the FIR number while preparing the inventory report. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the Applicant has been able to make out a fit case for grant of bail. 8. Accordingly, the Bail Application is allowed. 9. Let the Applicant—Abhijeet be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 10. It is made clear that any observation made hereinabove is only for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application and shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. 11. All pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. ( Ash ish Nait h an i, J.) 15.05.2026 Shiksha