ARUL RAJ v. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by The Superintendent of Police,
WP Crl./240/2026 · 2026-07-15
G K Ilanthiraiyan
Writ Petition (Criminal)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 54570 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 54570 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP Crl. No. 240 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN WP Crl. No. 240 of 2026 Arul Raj S/o. Susai, Thandel Varasanallur, Srimushnam Taluk, Cuddalore District - 608 702. ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by The Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore. 2. Inspector of Police, Solatharam Police Station, Cuddalore. 3. Arokia Das S/o. Abragam, Thandel Varasanallur, Srimushnam Taluk, Cuddalore District - 608 702. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition(Criminal) filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd Respondent to initiate appropriate action against the 3rd Respondent and accord me police protection to carry on the house construction work in Petition Properly comprised in S.No.201/2, Nankudi Village, Srimushnam Taluk, admeasuring 14 cents based on my representation dated 13.01.2026. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl. No. 240 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.Charles Kamalesh M.Appaji For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar, Counsel for Government of Tamilnadu (Crl.Side) for R1 and R2 Mr.J.Selvarajan for R3 ORDER This Writ Petition (Criminal) has been filed seeking a direction the 1st and 2nd Respondent to initiate appropriate action against the 3rd Respondent and accord police protection to carry on the house construction work in Petition Properly comprised in S.No.201/2, Nankudi Village, Srimushnam Taluk, admeasuring 14 cents based on my representation dated 13.01.2026. 2. It appears that there is boundary dispute between the parties and the third respondent in respect of the subject property. 3. Considering the overall facts of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant police protection for construction of house, since the adequate police protection is granted only to the “ Life and Limb” of a person. That apart, there is a civil dispute between the petitioner and the third respondent with regard to subject property. Hence, the petitioner ought to have approached the Civil Court for appropriate relief for construction of house. This court finds this petition is devoid of merits. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl. No. 240 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
4. With the above direction, this Writ Petition (Criminal) stands dismissed. No costs. 15-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VV
1. The Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Solatharam Police Station, Cuddalore. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl.
No. 240 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. VV WP Crl. No. 240 of 2026 15-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis