Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5456 (RAJ)

VIMAL PRAKASH SHARMA S/O SATYAPRAKASH SHARMA @ SATYANARAYAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/5915/2026 · 2026-04-06

Anuroop Singhi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:14028] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5915/2026 1. Vimal Prakash Sharma S/o Satyaprakash Sharma @ Satyanarayan, Aged About 55 Years, R/o House No. 2628, Janki Ballabh Ji Ka Mandir, Purana Ghat, Agra Road, Near Sisodiya Garden, Jaipur. 2. Om Prakash Sharma S/o Kalyan Das Ji Sharma, R/o House No. 2628, Janki Ballabh Ji Ka Mandir, Purana Ghat, Agra Road, Near Sisodiya Garden, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. District Collector, Jaipur. 3. Sub-Divisional Officer Jobner, District Jaipur. 4. Tehsildar Jobner, District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.S. Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 06/04/2026 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers:- "It is, therefore, humbly prayed that Your Lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and (i) By an appropriate writ, order of direction in the nature thereof the respondents may kindly be directed to remove the encroachment from the land of Maufi mandir Janki Ballabh Ji Purana Ghat, Jaipur bearing Khasra No. 592, [2026:RJ-JP:14028] (2 of 3) [CW-5915/2026] 593, 594, 595 situated in Village Gokulpura Tehsil Jobner and Khasra No. 624, 625, 626, 627, 628, 629, 630, 638, 639, 640, 641, 642, 643, 644, 645, 646, 647, 648, 649, 650, 651, 652, situated in Village Kalakh Tehsil Jobner District Jaipur and take effective action against grabbers who raised encroachment upon the said land. ii) By an appropriate writ, order of direction in the nature thereof the respondents may also be directed take legal action against the encroachers and punish them suitably. iii) Any other order which this Hon'ble Court deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the Petitioners.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in the present matter, petitioners have submitted representations before the District Collector, Jaipur, however, no heed was paid to the said representations by the authorities concerned. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners prays that the present writ petition be disposed of in light of the order dated 30.01.2019 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.10819/2018] with liberty to petitioners to file representation(s) before the Public Land Protection Cell (hereinafter referred to as ‘PLPC’) constituted in compliance of the order passed in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena (supra). 4. In that view of the matter, the present writ petition stands disposed of in light of the order passed in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena (supra) with a direction to petitioners to file representation(s) before the PLPC. It is further directed that the PLPC shall decide the representation(s), if any, filed by the petitioners, after affording an opportunity of hearing to petitioners [2026:RJ-JP:14028] (3 of 3) [CW-5915/2026] within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 6. Needless to say, this order has been passed only to decide the petitioners’ representation and in no manner is to be construed as a direction to decide the said representation in a particular manner. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J DIPESH CHAYAL /08