Kanaparthi Durga Bhavani v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/18332/2026 · 2026-07-07
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5456 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5456 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Date of pronouncement Date of uploading
APHC010343612026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE 8 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 18332/2026 Between:
1. KANAPARTHI DURGA BHAVANI, W/O SESHU BABU, AGE 35 YEARS, R/O 9-47, KODURU VILLAGE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, A. P. SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522239. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.521328
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AVANIGADDA, KRISHNA DISTRICT,
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KODURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.521328
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of thd respondents in
: 08.07.2026
: 18.07.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 18332/2026 KANAPARTHI DURGA BHAVANI, W/O SESHU BABU, AGE 35 47, KODURU VILLAGE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-521328.
...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, A. P. SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA
THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AVANIGADDA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.521328 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KODURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.521328 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of thd respondents in IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3504]
KUNCHEAM KANAPARTHI DURGA BHAVANI, W/O SESHU BABU, AGE 35 47, KODURU VILLAGE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, A. P. SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AVANIGADDA, THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KODURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of thd respondents in
2 MRK,J W.P.No.18332 of 2026
not registering FIR and not considering the illegal actions of the accused in accordance with procedure contemplated under section 173(3) of BNSS is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and also violations of Article 14,16,19 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to prevent the illegal action for committing further commission of offence and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to take up further investigation the offences u/s 3(1 )(r), 3(2)(va) of SC ST POA Act and pass order or orders in accordance with law, pending disposal of the writ petition may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAVI KIRAN KUMAR KOLUSU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR HOME
3 MRK,J W.P.No.18332 of 2026
The Court made the following Order:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in view of the subsequent events, no cause survives in this Writ Petition and the present Writ Petition became infructuous. 2. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J
Dated: 08.07.2026 MDP