[2026:RJ-JP:11920] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3666/2026 Muvin S/o Subba, Resident Of Jhantli Police Station Sikri District Bharatpur Present District Deeg (Raj) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Sewar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Liyakat Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 19/03/2026 1. This misc. bail application has been filed by the petitioner Muvin S/o Subba, under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. challenging the order dated 23.02.2026 passed by the Additional District and Session Judge No.1, District Bharatpur, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was dismissed as he breach the conditions of the previous bail order. On rejection of the bail order dated 23.02.2026, the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submitted that in the trial of the present case, petitioner was regularly appearing before the learned Trial Court since 2005, however, could not appear before the learned Trial Court on 26.09.2023 and therefore, his bail bonds were forfeited and arrest warrants were issued. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner was arrested by the police and is behind the bars since then. Learned counsel submitted that non appearance of the accused-petitioner [2026:RJ-JP:11920] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3666/2026] before the Trial Court was bona-fide and unintentional. Learned counsel also undertakes that the petitioner shall appear before the learned Trial Court on each and every date as fixed by the Court and the petitioner shall not make any attempt to jump the bail again, and therefore, in the interest of justice, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the bail application. 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, as also the undertaking of the learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date as fixed by the learned Trial Court, this Court is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Muvin S/o Subba shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage or misuse of liberty granted by this Court. It is made clear that the observations as made by this Court in the bail application, will not affect the trial of the case. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J Ravi Khandelwal/62