[2026:RJ-JP:15946] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4988/2026 Bittu S/o Mangilal, R/o Nai Basti Aklera Police Station Aklera District Jhalawar Hal Gobariya Bawari Police Station Anantpura Kota And Hal In Front of Truck Union Bombay Yojana Police Station Mahaveer Nagar Kota City (Rajasthan). (At Present Confined In Jail Kota) ----Accused/Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Singh Naruka For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 16/04/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No 90/2026 registered at Police Station Anantpura, District Kota City for the offence(s) under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 126(2), 3(5), 324(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that the accused-petitioner is behind the bars since long time; that nothing has been recovered at the instance of the accused- petitioner; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner; that the injuries sustained by the injured on his vital parts i.e. head and lower back, attributable to co-accused persons namely Arjun and Bhuvnesh; that the simple injury [2026:RJ-JP:15946] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4988/2026] sustained on thigh is attributed to the accused-petitioner; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that the accused-petitioner is behind the bars since long time; that nothing has been recovered at the instance of the accused-petitioner; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner; that the injuries sustained by the injured on his vital parts i.e. head and lower back, attributable to co-accused persons namely Arjun and Bhuvnesh; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Bittu S/o Mangilal is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2026:RJ-JP:15946] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4988/2026] 6. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J KAVISH/52